This is where you get answers to all your questions on the rules of
tennis - and get the chance to 'Stump the Ump' by coming up with a scenario
that beats the cold, analytical prowess of our resident USTA-certified master umpire -
who, for reasons of professional etiquette (and concern for his physical
well-being) must remain anonymous. Here's a sample question. See if you can figure out the answer before reading
the Ump's decision: Question
"My serve hit a low-flying pheasant as it swooped across the court.
After hitting the bird, the ball rebounded on to my side of the
court. My opponent fell as he tried to avoid the pheasant which
landed on his side of the net. I went over there to sort things out
(and claim my pheasant) but an argument ensued. Who won the point? (We were later disqualified from the
tournament for fighting but I want to know who was right!)" Decision
As you were both disqualified, the question of who won the point is clearly irrelevant. The important question is clearly,
"Who gets the pheasant". The server appears to have the stronger
argument as he brought the bird down and, without his power and accuracy, it would not be available to
either player. However, his opponent clearly has the advantage under the rules
of tennis. He rules his side of the net and his opponent cannot encroach on
his territory for any reason - even to retrieve "his" pheasant. The
receiver, therefore, is the only player permitted under the rules to touch the
pheasant and, as such, can claim and retain legal possession. Of course, once the players
were disqualified, the rules of tennis cease to apply and it's every man for
himself....
So, did you come up with the correct decision?
Click here to ask your own question, or
Read more questions submitted to our expert.
Click on the ID number of the question to learn the answer:
